Divorce Notice The Advertiser 6 September 1933 In the Divorce Court yesterday Mr. Justice Richards granted decrees nisi in the following divorce action: Florence Lavinia Elizabeth Jacobs, of Waikerie, against Harry Jacobs, formerly of Waikerie, on the ground of failure to pay maintenance. Mrs Jacobs was given custody of a child Robert George Jacobs.
JACOBS Fred & Ethel
Divorce Notice The Advertiser 27 April 1927 The Chief Justice (Sir George Murray), Mr. Justice Napier and Mr. Justice Richards sat in the Full Court yesterday and made absolute the decree nisi formerly granted in the following case: Fred Jacobs against Ethel Jacobs and Henry Leonard Dobson.Custody of the child or children was granted to the petitioner.
JAMES Maud grace Mennetti Clarice & William John
Divorce Notice The Advertiser 7 December 1933 In the Supreme Court yesterday, Mr Justice Angas Parsons granted an order nisi for divorce in an undefended action. Mr C.A. Sanders appeared for the plaintiff. Maud Grace Mennetti Clarice James, Dale street, Port Adelaide, against William John James, Exford terrace, New Kingston, South Australia, on the ground of desertion. Custody of a child, Nellie June, was given to Mrs James, and the question of maintenance was referred to the Master.
JEFFERY Mousley Bertha M. & Alfred William
_Divorce Notice The Advertiser Wednesday 17 August 1932 DECREE NISI TO BE ABSOLUTE . In May, 1928, Mousley Bertha Mabel Jeffery obtained a decree nisi for divorce from her husband, Alfred William Jeffery. Yesterday she applied to the Full Court, presided over by Mr. Justice Angas Parsons, Mr. Justice Napier, and Mr. Justice Piper, to have the decree made absolute. It was explained that the reason for the delay in the application was absence from the State and want of means. Mr. P. B. Angas Parsons appeared for the petitioner. The court granted the application subject to Mrs Jeffery filing a certain affidavit.”
JENNINGS George
The Advertiser 23 February 1900 Police Court - Adelaide Thursday, February 22. Mr. W.V. Smith applied, under section 11 of the Destitute Persons Act., 1881 to have an order made on November 3, 1892, against George Jennings, of Third Creek, to contribute 2/6 a week towards the support of his illegitimate child recinded on the ground that Jennings who was now married, was unable to continue the payments. Inspector Grey then laid a cross information to increase the amount of the payments. The Court held that as Jennings had a wife and child to support they would not interfere with the existing order and the two informations were dismissed.